reynoldswrite: you mean the flooding on the Mississippi? is it still surging?
obamamamablog: very funny. i mean the surge in that province
reynoldswrite: Anbar Province
obamamamablog: yeah. that's the one. and that was mccain's idea.
reynoldswrite: the surge had very little to do with peace in anbar
obamamamablog: i watched mccain on katie couric. he had all the details.
reynoldswrite: mama, I hate to break it to you, but mccain got it exactly wrong--totally backwards--and CBS covered for him.
obamamamablog: covered for him how?
reynoldswrite: katic couric asked him a question about the surge. he gave a totally false answer. CBS cut out the false answer and spliced in an answer from another question.
obamamamablog: how do you know they left out his wrong answer?
reynoldswrite: because they posted the entire interview on the internet, but only used the question and the improved answer on the air. Go here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ilan-goldenberg/not-a-gaffe-a-fundaemtnal_b_114394.html and here
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/22/mccain-gets-history-of-th_n_114419.html
obamamamablog: lord have mercy
reynoldswrite: mccain is not very smart
reynoldswrite: CBS is not very smart
reynoldswrite: anyone who thinks 'the surge' had anything to do with peace in Anbar is not very smart.
obamamamablog: you wouldn't have known without the internet. this internet is going to be the death of us all
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Obamamamablog: randy, i hope you're not upset by that New Yorker cover
reynoldswrite: you mean the one you taped to your cash register? I hadn't noticed.
obamamamablog: the Bible says many a true word was spoken in jest.
reynoldswrite: that's an old english proverb...not in the bible.
obamamamablog: well, you hadn't been by lately. I was just wondering if the poster made you uncomfortable.
reynoldswrite: what's to be uncomfortable about? No truth in it. anyone that wants to believe it, more power to them.
obamamamablog: somebody did the same thing about mccain.
reynoldswrite: no--the one about mccain is a real spoof. it has cindy mccain with an armload of stolen prescriptions and there's a constitution of the united states burning in the fireplace. see, there's some basis for that. which makes it satire. there is no basis for any of the obama stuff that was in the new yorker cover.
obamamamablog: so the mccain cover's okay but the obama cover is not.
reynoldswrite: the mccain cover in vanity fair is satire because it contains truth. the obama cover in new yorker is not satire because it's totally false.
obamamamablog: that sounds a little one-sided to me.
reynoldswrite: if you want to post satire on your cash register, then take down the new yorker and post vanity fair.
obamamamablog: that mccain cover is absurd.
reynoldswrite: no the obama cover is absurd. the mccain cover has some truth in it.
obamamamablog: they should ban them all.
reynoldswrite: no, that's freedom of speech. any lunatic, any non-student of history, any low-information editor or voter, has the right to publish their views. it's just surprising sometimes how ill-informed some editors and reporters are. and the people who eat at your restaurant.
obamamamablog: don't start with my customers. they're like family. you, too. been missing you. fried chicken today
obamamamablog: the Bible says many a true word was spoken in jest.
reynoldswrite: that's an old english proverb...not in the bible.
obamamamablog: well, you hadn't been by lately. I was just wondering if the poster made you uncomfortable.
reynoldswrite: what's to be uncomfortable about? No truth in it. anyone that wants to believe it, more power to them.
obamamamablog: somebody did the same thing about mccain.
reynoldswrite: no--the one about mccain is a real spoof. it has cindy mccain with an armload of stolen prescriptions and there's a constitution of the united states burning in the fireplace. see, there's some basis for that. which makes it satire. there is no basis for any of the obama stuff that was in the new yorker cover.
obamamamablog: so the mccain cover's okay but the obama cover is not.
reynoldswrite: the mccain cover in vanity fair is satire because it contains truth. the obama cover in new yorker is not satire because it's totally false.
obamamamablog: that sounds a little one-sided to me.
reynoldswrite: if you want to post satire on your cash register, then take down the new yorker and post vanity fair.
obamamamablog: that mccain cover is absurd.
reynoldswrite: no the obama cover is absurd. the mccain cover has some truth in it.
obamamamablog: they should ban them all.
reynoldswrite: no, that's freedom of speech. any lunatic, any non-student of history, any low-information editor or voter, has the right to publish their views. it's just surprising sometimes how ill-informed some editors and reporters are. and the people who eat at your restaurant.
obamamamablog: don't start with my customers. they're like family. you, too. been missing you. fried chicken today
Friday, July 11, 2008
reynoldswrite: what if obama got a marriage license for 2nd marriage b4 divorcing 1st wife?
obamamamablog: i'll swanee, did he do that?
reynoldswrite: I'm just saying... if he did would u vote for him?
obamamamablog: some people have no morals.
reynoldswrite: well, would you?
obamamamablog: it doesn't surprise me. i knew there was something shifty about him the first time i saw him.
reynoldswrite: ??? well??? would you vote for him if he got the marriage license for his second marriage while he was still married to wife #1? ??
obamamamablog: no.
reynoldswrite: how about the other ladies in the adult ladies sunday school class?
obamamamablog: no. I don't think any of us would vote for such a sorry man. but i never heard about this b4. did obama really do that?
reynoldswrite: no. obama has only been married once. to michelle.
obamamamablog: wait a minute! is this another one of your trick questions.
reynoldswrite: not a trick question at all. just a morals test.
obamamamablog: did I pass?
reynoldswrite: not if you vote for mccain.
obamamamablog: mccain?
reynoldswrite: HE'S the one who got the marriage license for his second marriage, before he divorced his first wife.
obamamamablog: you complain about all the stuff i send you regarding obama. so why are you sending me equally bad stuff about mccain?
reynoldswrite: the mccain stuff is true. the obama stuff is not. nuff said?
obamamamablog: why should i believe you?
reynoldswrite: if you want to know more, go here: http://q13.trb.com/news/la-na-divorce11-2008jul11,0,2292373.story ... or just google "mccain infidelity"
reynoldswrite: it made nancy reagan so mad she was ticked at him for years. even got the mccain ex-wife a white house job...
obamamamablog: you're destroying all my illusions about mccain
reynoldswrite: i'm telling you the truth. he was a wild and crazy guy.
obamamamablog: he was a hero and a patriot.
reynoldswrite: give me a break: he graduated last in his class at the naval academy, he crashed five planes in his career only one of which was shot down by the enemy
reynoldswrite: not only did he ACT wild and crazy...wilder and crazier than STEVE MARTIN... he even LOOKED LIKE steve martin. here's mccain with his ex wife and family...
reynoldswrite: I'm just saying... if he did would u vote for him?
obamamamablog: some people have no morals.
reynoldswrite: well, would you?
obamamamablog: it doesn't surprise me. i knew there was something shifty about him the first time i saw him.
reynoldswrite: ??? well??? would you vote for him if he got the marriage license for his second marriage while he was still married to wife #1? ??
obamamamablog: no.
reynoldswrite: how about the other ladies in the adult ladies sunday school class?
obamamamablog: no. I don't think any of us would vote for such a sorry man. but i never heard about this b4. did obama really do that?
reynoldswrite: no. obama has only been married once. to michelle.
obamamamablog: wait a minute! is this another one of your trick questions.
reynoldswrite: not a trick question at all. just a morals test.
obamamamablog: did I pass?
reynoldswrite: not if you vote for mccain.
obamamamablog: mccain?
reynoldswrite: HE'S the one who got the marriage license for his second marriage, before he divorced his first wife.
obamamamablog: you complain about all the stuff i send you regarding obama. so why are you sending me equally bad stuff about mccain?
reynoldswrite: the mccain stuff is true. the obama stuff is not. nuff said?
obamamamablog: why should i believe you?
reynoldswrite: if you want to know more, go here: http://q13.trb.com/news/la-na-divorce11-2008jul11,0,2292373.story ... or just google "mccain infidelity"
reynoldswrite: it made nancy reagan so mad she was ticked at him for years. even got the mccain ex-wife a white house job...
obamamamablog: you're destroying all my illusions about mccain
reynoldswrite: i'm telling you the truth. he was a wild and crazy guy.
obamamamablog: he was a hero and a patriot.
reynoldswrite: give me a break: he graduated last in his class at the naval academy, he crashed five planes in his career only one of which was shot down by the enemy
reynoldswrite: not only did he ACT wild and crazy...wilder and crazier than STEVE MARTIN... he even LOOKED LIKE steve martin. here's mccain with his ex wife and family...
obamamamablog: lord have mercy. if he had an arrow through his head he'd look just like steve martin! but i didn't know he was as wild as you say. i guess i'll have to read up on him some more. but i wonder why the news media doesn't cover this stuff?
Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Reynoldswriter: mama, you sent me the Maureen Dowd column of June 29 about Obama’s campaign being financed by wealthy financiers from Saudi Arabia.
0bamamamablog: you’re welcome
reynoldswriter: where did you get it?
obamamamablog: came to my inbox.
reynoldswriter: but I looked up her column of June 29 and that wasn’t it. This was a fake.
obamamamablog: it can’t be. It’s a photocopy of her column.
reynoldswriter: it’s a fake. She didn’t write it. It didn’t appear. No such thing has ever been in the new york times. Someone created it to look like it was an excerpt from the Times but it was only a piece of fiction
obamamamablog: I got it from somebody at my adult ladies Sunday school class. They said it was true. All these donations aren’t coming from Americans. They’re coming from Saudi financiers.
reynoldswriter: sorry. Not true. Go here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/08/maureen-dowd-becomes-fict_n_111509.html
If you want to complain about Saudi financiers, complain about the Bin Laden clan that invested so much in the careers of George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush. Go here:
http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=5222767827374358571&postID=7724801505074469504
or complain about the fact that 16 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi and old george bush was having breakfast with Saudis that very day (including bin laden’s brother) and when American airspace was shut down afterward, only planeloads of saudi’s got to leave. Obama has no Saudi connections. Bush is up their ass.
obamamamablog: well, you don’t have to lose your temper about it. I was only passing on what someone sent me from Sunday school.
reynoldswriter: be sure and tell them it was a lie. Just another lie. But seems like every church person in America is sending it to every other church person.
obamamamablog: I can’t call the Sunday school ladies liars. They mean well.
reynoldswriter: they’re suckers. Makes me want to quit going to church.
obamamamablog: you go to church?
reynoldswriter: no. but if I did, I’d quit over this.
obamamamablog: well, I’m sorry I brought up the Saudi thing. I thought I finally had the dealbreaker on obama.
obamamamablog: still there???
obamamamablog: been missing you at the café.
obamamamablog: randy?
reynoldswriter: where did you get it?
obamamamablog: came to my inbox.
reynoldswriter: but I looked up her column of June 29 and that wasn’t it. This was a fake.
obamamamablog: it can’t be. It’s a photocopy of her column.
reynoldswriter: it’s a fake. She didn’t write it. It didn’t appear. No such thing has ever been in the new york times. Someone created it to look like it was an excerpt from the Times but it was only a piece of fiction
obamamamablog: I got it from somebody at my adult ladies Sunday school class. They said it was true. All these donations aren’t coming from Americans. They’re coming from Saudi financiers.
reynoldswriter: sorry. Not true. Go here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/08/maureen-dowd-becomes-fict_n_111509.html
If you want to complain about Saudi financiers, complain about the Bin Laden clan that invested so much in the careers of George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush. Go here:
http://www.blogger.com/post-edit.g?blogID=5222767827374358571&postID=7724801505074469504
or complain about the fact that 16 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi and old george bush was having breakfast with Saudis that very day (including bin laden’s brother) and when American airspace was shut down afterward, only planeloads of saudi’s got to leave. Obama has no Saudi connections. Bush is up their ass.
obamamamablog: well, you don’t have to lose your temper about it. I was only passing on what someone sent me from Sunday school.
reynoldswriter: be sure and tell them it was a lie. Just another lie. But seems like every church person in America is sending it to every other church person.
obamamamablog: I can’t call the Sunday school ladies liars. They mean well.
reynoldswriter: they’re suckers. Makes me want to quit going to church.
obamamamablog: you go to church?
reynoldswriter: no. but if I did, I’d quit over this.
obamamamablog: well, I’m sorry I brought up the Saudi thing. I thought I finally had the dealbreaker on obama.
obamamamablog: still there???
obamamamablog: been missing you at the café.
obamamamablog: randy?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
